<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alpha.India &#8211; Long Grasim, short Nifty delivers 13%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://econohistory.com/article/1246/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://econohistory.com/article/1246?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=alpha-india-grasim-remains-the-top-potential-underperformer</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 14:47:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Orpheus</title>
		<link>http://econohistory.com/article/1246/comment-page-1#comment-1080</link>
		<dc:creator>Orpheus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 22:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econohistory.com/?p=1246#comment-1080</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post. Few things...If you go long and short withouth having an equal value of exposure on each side, your strategy can bomb. Second, our Numeric ranking for Indian stocks beyond Nifty 50 is for subscribers only. Please subscribe to Orpheus India Research services for further inputs.

Orpheus Research</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post. Few things&#8230;If you go long and short withouth having an equal value of exposure on each side, your strategy can bomb. Second, our Numeric ranking for Indian stocks beyond Nifty 50 is for subscribers only. Please subscribe to Orpheus India Research services for further inputs.</p>
<p>Orpheus Research</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pramod</title>
		<link>http://econohistory.com/article/1246/comment-page-1#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator>pramod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econohistory.com/?p=1246#comment-1079</guid>
		<description>Hi, today I have made a pair trade of  Hdfc Bank; Kotak Bank. I have bought Kotak Bank ( March Futures) at 715; shorted  HDFC Bank at 1696. Please guide me. Am I doing the right thing or not. Regards, Pramod Mann</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, today I have made a pair trade of  Hdfc Bank; Kotak Bank. I have bought Kotak Bank ( March Futures) at 715; shorted  HDFC Bank at 1696. Please guide me. Am I doing the right thing or not. Regards, Pramod Mann</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orpheus</title>
		<link>http://econohistory.com/article/1246/comment-page-1#comment-1000</link>
		<dc:creator>Orpheus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econohistory.com/?p=1246#comment-1000</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kind words and post.  The idea is very simple. Performance is cyclical and always against a benchmark. What we have done is just created a performance cycle methodology with which we can see where a certain asset is placed compared to it&#039;s benchmark. 

If the stock is on high of the performance cycle, we know it will start to underperform soon and vice versa. Peformance cycle is a part of time fractals. This means how long a certain asset may outperform or undeperform depends on what time frame you want to study performance on, performance intra day, peformance for a few days, few weeks, few months or few years.

Regarding your other question, you are comparing metal majors in NIFTY with BSE METALS composite Index. This is why the difference.

Orpheus Research</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind words and post.  The idea is very simple. Performance is cyclical and always against a benchmark. What we have done is just created a performance cycle methodology with which we can see where a certain asset is placed compared to it&#8217;s benchmark. </p>
<p>If the stock is on high of the performance cycle, we know it will start to underperform soon and vice versa. Peformance cycle is a part of time fractals. This means how long a certain asset may outperform or undeperform depends on what time frame you want to study performance on, performance intra day, peformance for a few days, few weeks, few months or few years.</p>
<p>Regarding your other question, you are comparing metal majors in NIFTY with BSE METALS composite Index. This is why the difference.</p>
<p>Orpheus Research</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shankar</title>
		<link>http://econohistory.com/article/1246/comment-page-1#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>Shankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://econohistory.com/?p=1246#comment-999</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I&#039;m an avid reader and think you guys are on to something big! A couple of queries..
1. How do you work out which stock is topping or bottoming out? And how much longer the under/out performance will continue?
2. In the above report, the metals sector is an underperformer, whereas most leading metal stocks are outperformers. Is there a contradiction or have I missed something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an avid reader and think you guys are on to something big! A couple of queries..<br />
1. How do you work out which stock is topping or bottoming out? And how much longer the under/out performance will continue?<br />
2. In the above report, the metals sector is an underperformer, whereas most leading metal stocks are outperformers. Is there a contradiction or have I missed something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
